Preparation for TA training begins months before that first August morning. CETLI opens TA trainer applications the spring semester before the training. The newly minted TA trainer cohort gathers later that spring for an initial introduction, both to each other and to CETLI staff, Ian Petrie, Karen Lagasse, and Whitney Howell, and the graduate student coordinators, Sasha Zborovsky and Pia Bhatia, who are returning, experienced trainers themselves.
Then, each trainer meets one-on-one with their CETLI staff member and coordinator to begin drafting the workshop. Sam Layding of Engineering, who would go on to become a CETLI TA trainer twice, found the one-on-one support invaluable. While they had experience as a TA, both at their undergraduate institution and Penn, they hadn’t gone through the CETLI TA training, so didn’t know what to expect. “That individual attention,” they say, helped them improve their workshop from the jump. “A different person came out of that first meeting that I had with Karen than the one who went into it. She really showed me how to organize my thoughts around a workshop in a way that I think would be hard to derive on my own.”
Next, through the month of May, the TA trainers meet for run-through days, where each trainer presents a draft of their workshop for the whole TA trainer group. The cohort of accepted TA Trainers includes graduate students with a wide range of experiences— some have gone through the TA training themselves, but some, like Layding, are entering the training for the first time as trainers.
For Emma Kocik of Earth and Environmental Sciences, going through TA training had been her first experience at Penn. It was where she met her cohort for the first time, too. While participating as a trainee had been useful, preparing to be a trainer put that initial experience into a new perspective: “What was shocking to me was just how much work went into the preparations,” she says.
Indeed, workshop run-through days are long, bonding days. “It takes a couple of full days of commitment,” Layding acknowledges, “but it’s worth it because it makes the finished product so much better for the people we’re trying to train.”